| Pages: [1] 2 |
1. RE: Cruiser killing Rokh? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
You're wasting your time. The Rokh is the single worst battleship in the game for fighting smaller ships alone. You'll never stack enough tracking mods for them to make a difference--you could fill every slot with tracking gear and it would not be...
- by Gorn Arming - at 2015.05.27 04:29:57
|
2. Machariel - DPS versus falloff - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
The Mach is now substantially better than any other BS for running most--maybe all--L4s. The warp speed bonus is killer, especially if you drop a warp speed rig or two on top of that. The TE nerf is irrelevant for PvE; it just means you fit an ac...
- by Gorn Arming - at 2014.11.07 03:17:49
|
3. The Abaddon - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
T2 tachyons don't fit neatly on a fleet Abaddon. Either use megabeams or meta 4 tachyons; either produces a decent enough fit. I think you end up needing a fitting implant for the meta tachyons, though; the fitting requirements on those are kinda ...
- by Gorn Arming - at 2014.07.06 15:19:00
|
4. what is the plural of "orthrus"? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Latin words without meaningful or attested plurals in Latin (e.g. "chimera" or "virus") are normally pluralized according to English convention ("chimeras" or "viruses") when pluralized in English. It's probably "Orthruses".
- by Gorn Arming - at 2014.06.14 19:06:00
|
5. PVP ships and reasons why they are good or bad - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Anyway, a srs post: Since tiericide it would be a shorter list to cover which ships aren't good, since most of the revised versions are good for something, even if it's not obvious what it is. I am sort of a fan of ridiculous trolling killmails,...
- by Gorn Arming - at 2013.10.24 02:57:00
|
6. PVP ships and reasons why they are good or bad - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Chessur wrote: Quote: You're a flat, honest-to-god idiot, Chessur. This is the kind of awful posting (and worse thinking) that I though was beneath FA. You don't know jack **** about the circumstances under which I engage targets because at...
- by Gorn Arming - at 2013.10.24 01:24:00
|
7. PVP ships and reasons why they are good or bad - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Chessur wrote: @ Taoist Dragon Would love to see a frig try and kill my Caracal / Cerb. I slaughter them in droves, and so should any properly fit cruiser that i mentioned. Frigs are bad solo / small gang PvP platforms, unless you like fighting...
- by Gorn Arming - at 2013.10.23 01:39:00
|
8. PVP ships and reasons why they are good or bad - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Chessur wrote: Hormone1971 wrote: This was an old topic that was quite helpful for all but needs some updating since some new ships have come about and ship changes since the latest update. When I say Frig or Cruiser it also includes Faction...
- by Gorn Arming - at 2013.10.22 20:27:00
|
9. Adaptive Module Stacking - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Meiyang Lee wrote: James Pickers wrote: Hey. One question, does the Adaptive Nano Plating and the Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane effect stack? They basically do the same thing (I think) but they are different modules. Thanks. -Pickers...
- by Gorn Arming - at 2013.10.13 18:09:00
|
10. Falloff now = Max range - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Hrett wrote: Ok, so for the math challenged, when I hover over my medium blasters in space (not in fitting window) and they show 4k optimal and 10k falloff, does that mean 14k total or 10k total? I always thought it would be 14. And for 2x fall...
- by Gorn Arming - at 2013.09.28 18:50:00
|
11. Falloff now = Max range - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
It's displayed differently now; the mechanics are the same. What's shown under "falloff" is the actual range at which you hit 1x falloff; i.e. your optimal is included.
- by Gorn Arming - at 2013.09.28 18:30:00
|
12. Imperial Navy Slicer Assistance? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Miles Winter wrote: Gorn Arming wrote: You're trying to use the slicer in an interceptor's role. It's not good at that. Interceptors have bonuses to tackle range, tackle mod cap use, and sig radius while MWDing. Your Slicer might be as fast ...
- by Gorn Arming - at 2013.08.04 19:52:00
|
13. Imperial Navy Slicer Assistance? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
You're trying to use the slicer in an interceptor's role. It's not good at that. Interceptors have bonuses to tackle range, tackle mod cap use, and sig radius while MWDing. Your Slicer might be as fast as an inty, but you have a vastly larger sig ...
- by Gorn Arming - at 2013.08.04 19:24:00
|
14. Tanking Question - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Whitehound wrote: When you fit a 400mm plate will you lose a lot of PG and also a fair amount of speed and gain inertia. Perhaps first try to fit a Reactive Armor Hardener instead. If this is not enough tank might you want to get into a bigger ...
- by Gorn Arming - at 2013.08.03 07:29:00
|
15. Racial Drones in PVP - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
My first set is almost always ECM drones. If I have room, a set of Warrior IIs follows that. On a dedicated drone ship (say, the Arbitrator) where I can fit two sets of DPS drones in addition to ECM drones and warriors, I usually get Vespa IIs as...
- by Gorn Arming - at 2013.07.31 23:12:00
|
16. speed/sig tanking tool - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
You guys are arguing with a brick. I'm going to explain this, not for Whitehound's benefit, but in case there any other confused people who can't figure out what the hell is going on in this incredibly dumb discussion: "Weight" refers to the forc...
- by Gorn Arming - at 2013.07.31 01:46:00
|
17. speed/sig tanking tool - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Whitehound wrote: Gypsio III wrote: Whitehound wrote: Gypsio III wrote: Whitehound wrote: There is nothing wrong with being inaccurate. This attitude explains a lot about your posts. Know that you are trolling. People who do ...
- by Gorn Arming - at 2013.07.30 19:35:00
|
18. speed/sig tanking tool - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
This is some honest-to-god third grade "do you understand division" stuff. I don't have the faintest idea how to explain this on a level you'll understand, Whitehound, so I'm not even going to try. Good luck out there.
- by Gorn Arming - at 2013.07.28 17:15:00
|
19. speed/sig tanking tool - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Math isn't the problem. Doing the math correctly will lead you to the right numbers, but Whitehound is--as always--bad at math. A 30% sig reduction is equivalent to a (1/(1-0.3)) or a 42.9% speed increase. Whitey, try to remember it this way--a 1...
- by Gorn Arming - at 2013.07.28 16:22:00
|
20. Stasis Web vs Tracking Computer w/ Tracking Speed Script - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Whitehound wrote: Webs (60%) are better than TPs (37.5%) and TCs (30%), but only work within 9km-14km range. TPs work a bit better than TCs, but require a lock (just like webs), have a long cycle time and are limited by an optimal range and fa...
- by Gorn Arming - at 2013.07.14 07:24:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |